Hello,
As I suggested, I would start /always/ with nanothermite. ...For example,..... "This year brought a big news and change to 9/11 Movement - the irrefutable scientific evidence of the presence of the explosive nanothermite in the dust of WTC. That drove us, The Davis For 9/11 groups, to question again, and with renewed vigor, the results of the Government commission and government official version". ... and ease into your insider theme about Commission, details ...... somelike that. //////// whatever you write is fine with me.
Here is one liner from me. Lets see if we see other proposals, too.
"Our mission is to gather a critical mass of public common knowledge, understanding and acceptance of the truth regarding the tragic events of 9/11, by educating and informing ourselves and others, in order to achieve new independent facts-based investigation, and finally, to witness resulting official recognition of the Truth of 9/11, so that history accounts can be officially corrected, and the war empire forces can be revealed, removed from power, brought to account, thus being defeated, for the sake of world peace and world prosperity".
- Some design links, for those who want to hand code.
I probably must be missing something. I think the issue is practically cleared away now, as much as possible.
-That "somebody "really doesn't like" somebody else" is not a cause to make somebody stop attending the group... in my view
-I would, of course, always respect the majority verdict, but as it is now, I will not join any calls for reducing the membership.
-"Reckless and malicious?" .. I must be really missing this part.
-Yes, as I said, I clearly see what Mark did and is doing for the cause of 9/11. Others are just as much contributing to the common efforts, in their ways.
So no, I do not see a reason why Mark should be advised not to come to the meetings against his own decision.
Petr
I am proposing, early enough,
1. day, Howard and Rodney speak.
2. day, Chris, Jim and Alex
Themes, up to you .. 9/11, intro, the group, your take, your experiences, activites, engage the public. ...
Bring a list of websites, display them, mention them, briefly discuss them.
I came over an interesting, shocking info, the material you talked about ...
it a comment from
http://sacbee.com/So Arnold cuts $1 Billion from California's Higher Education Systems.
The simple fact is 250,000 Students will be denied Community College Access and 40,000 student slots are now removed from the CSU System.
And, Arnold wants $1.9 Billion for New State Prisons, and there are no cuts to the California Department of Corrections, where according to Senator Loni Hancock of Alameda County, 54,000 CDC Employees watch over 180,000 State Prisoners.
About 80% of the "Felons" in the CDC are in for possession of less than a gram of Rock Cocaine, small amounts of Marijuana, and other Non-Violent Prohibition related "Crime".
End the Prohibition - and the felonization of our societies medical and social problems - and we save $10 Billion annually, we get to close Prisons, fire CDC State Welfare Cases who earn $80,000 per year base, and restore our schools.
Where is the sanity?
Posts
